<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for "All is Vanity"</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.therices.org/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.therices.org</link>
	<description>Life and Technology from Inner-City Philly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Promise VessRAID 1840i by Jason</title>
		<link>http://walt.therices.org/index.php/2011/01/promise-vessraid-1840i/comment-page-1/#comment-11328</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.therices.org/?p=206#comment-11328</guid>
		<description>Just purchased the 1840i.  Having some real issues this this unit and active directory setup.  I would agree with everthing in this article and the comments made by others.  I also have a Vtrack which was easy to set up in a SAS configuration connected to multiple servers, but this thing is a bear to get set up in a NAS configuration.  haven&#039;t tried ISCSI yet on this box, but that wasn&#039;t what I bought it for.  Working with tech support on trying to get it resolved usingh the 3.06 firmware update but still they are having to send me up to the next level of support.  Seriously considering putting it back in the box and sending it back if they don&#039;t get this resolved soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just purchased the 1840i.  Having some real issues this this unit and active directory setup.  I would agree with everthing in this article and the comments made by others.  I also have a Vtrack which was easy to set up in a SAS configuration connected to multiple servers, but this thing is a bear to get set up in a NAS configuration.  haven&#8217;t tried ISCSI yet on this box, but that wasn&#8217;t what I bought it for.  Working with tech support on trying to get it resolved usingh the 3.06 firmware update but still they are having to send me up to the next level of support.  Seriously considering putting it back in the box and sending it back if they don&#8217;t get this resolved soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corporate Inbreeding by Jessica</title>
		<link>http://walt.therices.org/index.php/2009/03/corporate-inbreeding/comment-page-1/#comment-10727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.therices.org/?p=144#comment-10727</guid>
		<description>Because most of the people who can vote to make a difference don&#039;t inform themselves about polices and political failures. Therefore their ignorance leads them to either: vote for an incompetent politician or don&#039;t go vote to make a change. Sadly enough it’s usually the majority who persist on complaining when they aren&#039;t going to do nothing about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because most of the people who can vote to make a difference don&#8217;t inform themselves about polices and political failures. Therefore their ignorance leads them to either: vote for an incompetent politician or don&#8217;t go vote to make a change. Sadly enough it’s usually the majority who persist on complaining when they aren&#8217;t going to do nothing about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Promise VessRAID 1840i by admin</title>
		<link>http://walt.therices.org/index.php/2011/01/promise-vessraid-1840i/comment-page-1/#comment-10606</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.therices.org/?p=206#comment-10606</guid>
		<description>I got these units just before Promise required them to be purchased with drives, which is robbery, quite honestly.  You add some good points to the review, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got these units just before Promise required them to be purchased with drives, which is robbery, quite honestly.  You add some good points to the review, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Promise VessRAID 1840i by PaulR</title>
		<link>http://walt.therices.org/index.php/2011/01/promise-vessraid-1840i/comment-page-1/#comment-10605</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.therices.org/?p=206#comment-10605</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a good overview.  I&#039;ve been extremely happy with the Vtrak M300i and needed to buy a couple more units.  I&#039;d settled on the VessRAID 1840i but wanted to see a review or two before clicking the submit button on an order.  

Google brought me here, and so far it&#039;s confirmed what I&#039;ve always believed about our Promise arrays-- good price, great hardware.  My only complaint with VessRAID is they wll only replicate with other devices on the same subnet. (confirmed by Promise support) 

The sales guys tried to up-sell us on the Enterprise products, at 5x the price.  We said No Thanks and built a transparent layer 2 bridge between our two main facilities so these units could talk with each other.  IMO, any device that already communicates via TCP/IP should NOT be crippled to a single subnet.  That made me grumble.

The other nit to pick, is Promise forces us to buy 8x SATA disks, which we do not want or use.  As a service provider, we buy disks by the case at a LOT cheaper price-- plus WE get to control the brand of the disk (we like Seagate Constellations and Cheetahs).

One of the arrays we bought will be filled with 15k SAS Cheetahs-- so we have 8 SATA disks laying on the shelf we don&#039;t need.  Total waste of money.  Too bad Promise took our options away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a good overview.  I&#8217;ve been extremely happy with the Vtrak M300i and needed to buy a couple more units.  I&#8217;d settled on the VessRAID 1840i but wanted to see a review or two before clicking the submit button on an order.  </p>
<p>Google brought me here, and so far it&#8217;s confirmed what I&#8217;ve always believed about our Promise arrays&#8211; good price, great hardware.  My only complaint with VessRAID is they wll only replicate with other devices on the same subnet. (confirmed by Promise support) </p>
<p>The sales guys tried to up-sell us on the Enterprise products, at 5x the price.  We said No Thanks and built a transparent layer 2 bridge between our two main facilities so these units could talk with each other.  IMO, any device that already communicates via TCP/IP should NOT be crippled to a single subnet.  That made me grumble.</p>
<p>The other nit to pick, is Promise forces us to buy 8x SATA disks, which we do not want or use.  As a service provider, we buy disks by the case at a LOT cheaper price&#8211; plus WE get to control the brand of the disk (we like Seagate Constellations and Cheetahs).</p>
<p>One of the arrays we bought will be filled with 15k SAS Cheetahs&#8211; so we have 8 SATA disks laying on the shelf we don&#8217;t need.  Total waste of money.  Too bad Promise took our options away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That Navy internship finally paid off&#8230; by Dave Theis</title>
		<link>http://walt.therices.org/index.php/2010/07/that-navy-internship-finally-paid-off/comment-page-1/#comment-9648</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Theis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.therices.org/?p=199#comment-9648</guid>
		<description>Awesome story!!!  Everything is in God&#039;s Grand Plan!!!!!  :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome story!!!  Everything is in God&#8217;s Grand Plan!!!!!  :o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Promise VessRAID 1840i by admin</title>
		<link>http://walt.therices.org/index.php/2011/01/promise-vessraid-1840i/comment-page-1/#comment-8684</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.therices.org/?p=206#comment-8684</guid>
		<description>Sorry, no experience with the E-series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, no experience with the E-series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Promise VessRAID 1840i by Darren</title>
		<link>http://walt.therices.org/index.php/2011/01/promise-vessraid-1840i/comment-page-1/#comment-8602</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.therices.org/?p=206#comment-8602</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the VessRAID review. I have a couple of them in my network and they are also working well.  The only thing that makes me a bit nervous is the single RAID controller.  From a fault-tolerance point of view, the controller is a single point of failure.  For future network storage, I am considering moving up to the E-series VTrak product because it seems a bit more robust overall and does have dual RAID controllers.  Do you have any experience with these?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the VessRAID review. I have a couple of them in my network and they are also working well.  The only thing that makes me a bit nervous is the single RAID controller.  From a fault-tolerance point of view, the controller is a single point of failure.  For future network storage, I am considering moving up to the E-series VTrak product because it seems a bit more robust overall and does have dual RAID controllers.  Do you have any experience with these?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Access 2007 Debugging Disabled? by Dean</title>
		<link>http://walt.therices.org/index.php/2009/07/access-2007-debugging-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-8377</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.therices.org/?p=161#comment-8377</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Thought I was going CRAZY. Another hour shot on Microsoft stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Thought I was going CRAZY. Another hour shot on Microsoft stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Promise VessRAID 1840i by sdx</title>
		<link>http://walt.therices.org/index.php/2011/01/promise-vessraid-1840i/comment-page-1/#comment-7576</link>
		<dc:creator>sdx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.therices.org/?p=206#comment-7576</guid>
		<description>We run lots of VTrak m610i and VessRAID 1840i since a couple of years back, and overall we&#039;re happy with them. They&#039;re fairly cheap and perform pretty well. Also, we never lost a unit. The only issue we have that there seems to be a memory leak in the administrative software, which makes the GUI/CLI unavailable, but the device is still processing iSCSI traffic. So, all in all, a good price/performance deal. It is still cheaper to build a storage system yourself, for instance, using solaris on supermicro chassis, but promise is far easier to manage than a full-blown solaris box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We run lots of VTrak m610i and VessRAID 1840i since a couple of years back, and overall we&#8217;re happy with them. They&#8217;re fairly cheap and perform pretty well. Also, we never lost a unit. The only issue we have that there seems to be a memory leak in the administrative software, which makes the GUI/CLI unavailable, but the device is still processing iSCSI traffic. So, all in all, a good price/performance deal. It is still cheaper to build a storage system yourself, for instance, using solaris on supermicro chassis, but promise is far easier to manage than a full-blown solaris box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Access 2007 Debugging Disabled? by Bruno</title>
		<link>http://walt.therices.org/index.php/2009/07/access-2007-debugging-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-7406</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.therices.org/?p=161#comment-7406</guid>
		<description>This post was awesome! Solved my problem and let my code free from so many message boxes. Thanks a lot from Brazil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was awesome! Solved my problem and let my code free from so many message boxes. Thanks a lot from Brazil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

